Exploring the Virtual Physiological Human initiative and the future of cardiovascular medicine through digital twin technology
The human heart beats approximately 100,000 times each day, pumping blood through a network of vessels that could circle the Earth four times. This incredible organ has fascinated scientists for centuries, yet its complex nature continues to challenge our understanding. In recent decades, a revolutionary approach has emerged that combines mathematics, computer science, and biology to create comprehensive digital replicas of cardiac function—ushering in a new era of cardiovascular medicine.
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death globally, claiming an estimated 17.9 million lives each year. Computational physiology offers a powerful new approach to understanding these conditions.
The Virtual Physiological Human (VPH) Initiative and the broader Physiome Project represent ambitious international efforts to create computational models of human physiology, with the heart standing as one of their most advanced achievements. These digital hearts are not mere computer animations; they are sophisticated mathematical representations that can simulate everything from molecular interactions to whole-organ function, providing unprecedented insights into cardiac health and disease 1 .
The significance of this research extends far beyond academic curiosity. By creating virtual replicas of individual patients' hearts—often called digital twins—clinicians can test treatments digitally before applying them in the real world, reducing risks and improving outcomes 4 .
An international collaboration focused on developing computational models of human physiology for personalized medicine.
A comprehensive effort to define the physiome through the development of databases and models of physiological processes.
At the core of the VPH and Physiome projects lies the concept of multiscale modeling—the idea that to truly understand biological systems, we must represent them at multiple levels of organization simultaneously. The heart functions as an integrated system where processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, and organ levels continuously interact 4 .
Models of ion channels, transporters, and signaling pathways
Models of cardiomyocyte electrophysiology, metabolism, and contraction
Models of electrical propagation and mechanical function
Whole-heart models of pumping function and blood flow
Models of cardiovascular circulation and neurohumoral regulation
One of the most promising applications of computational cardiac physiology is the creation of digital twins—patient-specific virtual replicas that can be used to predict individual health outcomes and test therapies in silico. The concept borrows from engineering, where digital twins of aircraft engines or industrial equipment are used to optimize performance and predict maintenance needs 4 .
A digital twin of a human heart, created from medical imaging data
The Physiome Project is an international effort to develop a comprehensive framework for computational human physiology. It establishes standards for model representation, annotation, and sharing, ensuring that models built by different research groups can be integrated and compared. The project emphasizes reproducibility and reusability—critical factors in advancing the field 5 .
Models that simulate the electrical activity of the heart, from ion channels to wave propagation 7 .
Models that represent how electrical excitation leads to force generation and contraction 4 .
Models of biochemical networks that convert substrates into usable energy for the heart 9 .
The rhythm of the heart is governed by electrical impulses that spread through specialized conduction pathways and myocardial tissue. Computational models of cardiac electrophysiology use mathematical equations to represent the flow of ions across cell membranes and the propagation of electrical waves through cardiac tissue 7 .
While electrical activation initiates contraction, the heart's primary function is mechanical—to pump blood through the circulatory system. Models of cardiac biomechanics represent how electrical excitation leads to calcium release, myofilament activation, and ultimately force generation and shortening 4 .
The heart requires tremendous amounts of energy to sustain its pumping function, consuming more ATP per gram than any other organ. Computational models of cardiac metabolism represent the complex biochemical networks that convert substrates into usable energy 9 .
A landmark study published in the European Journal of Heart Failure in 2025 demonstrates the power and potential of computational approaches in cardiology. The research team set out to investigate myocardial metabolism in patients with advanced heart failure—a condition characterized by severe energy depletion that conventional methods had struggled to analyze systematically 9 .
The researchers adopted a meticulous approach to create patient-specific computational models of myocardial metabolism:
The study yielded several groundbreaking findings that advanced our understanding of heart failure:
| Parameter | Heart Failure Patients | Controls | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximal ATP production rate | 0.42 ± 0.15 μmol/g/s | 0.68 ± 0.18 μmol/g/s | <0.01 |
| Glucose utilization fraction | 68.3 ± 12.7% | 42.5 ± 10.9% | <0.01 |
| Fatty acid utilization fraction | 23.8 ± 9.4% | 48.2 ± 11.3% | <0.01 |
| Metabolic flexibility index | 0.29 ± 0.11 | 0.62 ± 0.14 | <0.01 |
This study represents a paradigm shift in how we approach heart failure and potentially other complex diseases. By moving beyond a one-size-fits-all understanding of heart failure metabolism, the research highlights the metabolic heterogeneity underlying what appears to be a uniform clinical condition. The findings suggest that computational modeling can identify patient subgroups who might benefit from targeted metabolic therapies—an approach that could lead to more personalized treatment strategies 9 .
The field of computational cardiac physiology relies on a diverse array of research tools and resources. These include software platforms, experimental data, and computational frameworks that enable the construction, validation, and application of heart models.
| Tool Category | Specific Examples | Function and Application |
|---|---|---|
| Modeling Software and Platforms | OpenCOR, Chaste, SimTK | Simulation environments for running computational models 5 |
| Model Repositories | Physiome Model Repository, CellML.org | Stores for sharing and exchanging computational models 5 |
| Experimental Data Sources | Proteomics datasets, Clinical imaging databases | Provide biological parameters for personalizing models 9 |
| Standardization Frameworks | CellML, FieldML, SBML | Standard languages for encoding mathematical models 5 |
| Validation Datasets | Electrophysiology recordings, Clinical outcomes data | Used to test and refine computational models 9 |
These tools collectively form the infrastructure that supports computational cardiac research. The open-source nature of many resources has been crucial in accelerating progress, allowing researchers worldwide to build upon each other's work. Initiatives like the VPH Institute have been instrumental in promoting tool sharing and collaboration across institutions and disciplines 1 .
The field of computational cardiac physiology is advancing rapidly, with several exciting developments on the horizon:
Researchers are increasingly combining mechanistic models with machine learning techniques to create more efficient and personalized models. AI can help parameterize models from clinical data and identify patterns not obvious from first principles 4 .
Efforts are underway to bring computational tools directly into clinical practice. The 2025 Cardiac Arrhythmia Mechanisms Conference will highlight work using digital twins for guiding ablation procedures .
Researchers within the VPH Institute are working to connect cardiac models with models of other physiological systems, creating more comprehensive virtual patients for drug testing and disease research 1 .
Despite the exciting progress, computational cardiac physiology faces significant challenges. Model validation remains difficult, particularly for personalized predictions that could affect clinical decision-making. Regulatory frameworks are still evolving to evaluate and approve digital twins and in silico trials. There are also important questions about data privacy when creating highly detailed virtual representations of individual patients 4 .
The development of computational models of the heart—from the pioneering cellular models of Noble to the sophisticated multiscale models of today—represents one of the most successful applications of mathematical biology to medicine. These digital hearts are transforming how we understand cardiovascular function, how we develop new therapies, and how we treat individual patients 4 7 .
As research continues, we can expect these models to become increasingly integrated into clinical practice, potentially leading to a future where each patient has a digital twin that helps guide their prevention and treatment strategies.
The work of the VPH Institute, Physiome Project, and countless researchers worldwide continues to advance this vision, bringing us closer to a era of truly personalized, predictive cardiovascular medicine 1 .
The rhythm of innovation in computational cardiac physiology continues to accelerate, promising to keep our digital hearts beating in time with our physical ones for years to come.